Cholesterol and blood fats
Chromiumand LDL cholesterol
Both sources here found no clear difference in LDL cholesterol.
How sure anyone can be
Low certainty, level 2 of 4Further research is likely to change this.
The most certain of the two findings here; each record carries its own.
The numbers reported
One source’s range, drawn against its own line of no difference and scaled to its own numbers.
-19.58-8.54 mg/dL2.49
This range crosses the no-difference line, so these numbers fit a real difference and no difference at all equally well.
Two sources, newest first
What we read is the published abstract, not the full paper, so a blank below may still be printed in the paper itself. A fixed rule worked this out from the source’s own fields. Nobody checked this rating by hand.
Systematic review, 2022
Low certainty, level 2 of 4Effect of Chromium Supplementation on Blood Glucose and Lipid Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022;200(2):516-525. doi:10.1007/s12011-021-02693-3. PMID:33783683.
- Number reported
- Not in the abstract
- Which way it went
- No clear difference
- Likely range
- Not in the abstract
- Source’s own words
- LDL vs placebo control; no statistically significant difference; magnitude not given
- Who was studied
- Adult with type 2 diabetes
- Compared with
- placebo
- Amount taken
- Not in the abstract
- For how long
- Not in the abstract
- Disagreement between studies
- Not in the abstract
- Kind of record
- Journal article
How this rating was reachedstarts at High, 2 steps down: risk of bias and imprecision
- Starts at High
- Risk of bias brought it down to Moderatethe abstract reports no risk-of-bias or quality appraisal, so study limitations cannot be ruled outNot in the abstract
- Imprecision brought it down to Lowthe abstract reports no confidence interval for the estimateNot in the abstract
- Ends at Low2 steps down.
- Checked, nothing to step it down for
- indirectness
- Inconsistency
- No disagreement reported, and no count of studies behind it
Imprecision stops at the first check that applies; others may apply too.
Source saved; quote checked byte-for-byte against it by software; no signature.
Systematic review, 2021
Low certainty, level 2 of 4Effects of chromium supplementation on lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2021;66:126741. doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2021.126741. PMID:33813266.
- Number reported
- -8.54 mg/dL
- Which way it went
- No clear difference
- Likely range
- -19.58 to 2.49
- Source’s own words
- mg/dl LDL-C, weighted mean difference vs control (not significant)
- Who was studied
- Adult with type 2 diabetes
- Compared with
- placebo or control
- Amount taken
- Recorded detail — mcg/d elemental chromium
- For how long
- Not in the abstract
- Disagreement between studies
- random-effects model with I2 assessed; not quantified in the abstract
- Kind of record
- Journal article
How this rating was reachedstarts at High, 2 steps down: risk of bias and imprecision
- Starts at High
- Risk of bias brought it down to Moderatethe abstract reports no risk-of-bias or quality appraisal, so study limitations cannot be ruled outNot in the abstract
- Imprecision brought it down to Lowthe confidence interval includes no effectReported in the abstract
- Ends at Low2 steps down.
- Checked, nothing to step it down for
- indirectness
- Inconsistency
- No disagreement reported, and no count of studies behind it
Imprecision stops at the first check that applies; others may apply too.
AI review could not confirm it — an AI agent re-read this finding against the saved source and at least one check failed. The batch record names the check and quotes the sentence that caused the doubt. No person read it.
What is still missing from these readings
- One give no number at all, only which way it went.
- One gives no likely range, so how precise that number is is unknown.
- Two do not say how many people took part.
- Amount taken — One of Two readings: Not in the abstract.
- For how long — Not in the abstract.
Something nobody wrote down is never a zero and never a guess.
Still to read for Chromium
Two of the 11 things on our list for Chromium have no reading here yet:
- Blood glucose (continuous, CGM)
- Body fat percentage
Still to read means nobody here has got to it, not that it was tried and did nothing or that no research exists. A pairing on no list is not a gap: we never set out to read it.
Read next
Chromium
Eight other questions read for it
Cholesterol and blood fats
70 questions read under it
LDL cholesterol
19 other ingredients read against it
First six, alphabetical, and by nothing else. The rest are on Cholesterol and blood fats.
This is a library, not advice. No recommendation, no dose, no diagnosis, no ranking. We never ask about your symptoms, and nothing here is tailored to you.